|HOME||MEDIAVILLAGE.com||WOMEN ADVANCING||HOOKED UP||MEMBERSHIP INFO||MEMBER COMPANIES||MEDIA BUSINESS REPORT||ECONOMIC FORECASTS||RESEARCH|
Published: June 27, 2008 at 07:09 PM GMT
Last Updated: July 1, 2008 at 07:09 PM GMT
Consumers have demonstrated a preference for three basic types of online video experiences over the past few months: Video Snacking, Download-to-Own and Online Television. Each of these three consumer behaviors has a specific value chain associated with it. Video Snacks are hard to directly monetize. Download-to-Own files are hard to protect. But, Online Television is, for all intents and purposes, television using the public Internet as the distribution network. And people who have popular content are enjoying excellent financial results from making that content available online.
You can find examples of Internet Television at hulu.com, abc.com, nbc.com, cbs.com, fox.com. In fact, almost every major television network offers some kind of online viewing experience for their most popular shows. Which begs the question, "What does quality online video look like?" Should it look like Standard Definition Television? Should it look like HDTV? Should it have to meet "broadcast quality" standards as a benchmark?
We have come to the time in the transition from network to networked television where setting some minimum requirements for the online viewing experience would be helpful. I'd like to assemble a group of video professionals, compile a list of requirements and set-up some independent testing groups to play video watchdog for the industry. And, I'd like you to help me get it done!
To start the dialog, here are my suggestions for the subjective attributes of quality online video:
1) The video has to start very quickly (like within a second of when you press the play button).
2) Continuous, full motion video that looks sharp at full screen.
3) Colorspace that matches or exceeds broadcast NTSC television,
4) Stereo audio with a dynamic range that exceeds broadcast standards.
5) No buffering after the initial picture comes on, no exceptions.
6) No drop out, pixilated frames or other artifacts on the screen.
To achieve these subjective goals, we will have to create a set of test criterion that takes several things into consideration:
1) Encoding, the art and science of master video files and making them available for distribution.
2) The player software.
3) The topology of the distribution network.
4) Speed of the user's broadband connection.
5) The quality of the user's broadband connection.
6) The quality of the user's computer.
With all of these variables, it is very difficult to maintain video quality from video publisher to consumer (no matter how you define quality). Mostly because there are so many components along the signal path that video publishers don't control. But let's press on.
If we were to start thinking about measuring the quality of an online video viewing experience here are a few things we might measure:
1) Start Time: As measured by the average time it takes for video to begin playing.
2) Quantity of Impairments: As measured by the number of impairments over a given length of time.
3) Average Length of Impairments: As measured by the average duration of stalls or buffering.
4) Wait Time on Seek: As measured by the average duration of buffering or stalls before the video begins to play from the seek points.
5) Wait Time on Ad Break / Return: As measured by the average delay duration when programming cuts to an ad, or when an ad ends and returns to regular programming.
6) Video Quality Delivered: As measured by average video bit rate delivered.
7) Link Efficiency: As measured by the percentage of a user's bandwidth consumed.
8) Encroachment Test: Tiered scoring of the above tests as additional viewers move onto the network.
The list above isn't complete, but it's a start.
We also need to set standards that adjust for the type of broadband environment in which the video will be consumed. For example: ADSL at 768 kpbs down and 384 kpbs up or Cable modem at 5 Mbps down by 768 kpbs up. Unless you take the network environment into consideration, the standards will be hard to achieve. We will have to "handicap" our standards to the limits of each network.
So here's the pitch. Online video is coming into its own. People are watching and, as in industry, we need to define a quality experience the same way that the broadcast networks do. We need to create testing environments and set standards of quality that each distributor can strive to achieve. I think it's a job for everyone who wants to be involved. To join my ad hoc group, email me at email@example.com. It's time.
Shelly Palmer is Managing Director of Advanced Media Ventures Group LLC and the author of Television Disrupted: The Transition from Network to Networked TV (2006, Focal Press). Shelly is also President of the National Academy of Television Arts & Sciences, NY (the organization that bestows the coveted Emmy® Awards). He is the Vice-Chairman of the National Academy of Media Arts & Sciences an organization dedicated to education and leadership in the areas of technology, media and entertainment. Palmer also oversees the Advanced Media Technology Emmy® Awards which honors outstanding achievements in the science and technology of advanced media. You can read Shelly’s blog here. Shelly can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org
From EPGs and Channels to Sites and Browsers to Apps
Media evolves. Print, from paper to digital; radio from on air to on line; out of home from static to dynamic; television from broadcast to addressable. While the importance of linear television and its increasingly addressable nature will remain highly significant for at least five more years and possibly more, the next phase of message distribution represents fundamental change and a significant opportunity, or threat, to all advertisers.
Not Your Father’s Tune-In -- Part 1
Tune-in advertising has been getting smarter. The category, also known as audience promotion, actually works to cause ratings lifts. Now that people are measuring these lifts, the category has evolved into a high level of direct marketing closed-loop thinking.
Video Pick: The End of “Mad Men” (Again)
Ready for some ready-made nostalgia, “Mad Men” fans?
Q&A: IPG SE Asia on Automation, Programmatic and TV
Jay Sears, Senior Vice President Marketplace Development of Rubicon Project discusses “Automation, Programmatic and TV” with Yean Cheong of IPG Mediabrands’ Cadreon in SE Asia. The two executives appeared at Rubicon Project’s 2nd Annual Real Time Trading Update from SE Asia's Buy Side in Bintan, Indonesia in July 2015.
Success on YouTube: These Four Brands are Doing It Right
There’s a huge variety of brands on YouTube and lessons to learn from the ways they tell stories and build communities.
VMA Takeaway: Miley Cyrus is Boring
Miley Cyrus likes to smoke pot and show off her tits. (Her choice of words, not mine.) That was the takeaway from her gig as host of the 32nd annual VMA Awards on MTV Sunday night – and most of her pre-show publicity, as well, which included an appearance on ABC’s “Jimmy Kimmel Live” in which she wore an outfit that covered most of her body except for her breasts. They were bare except for strategically placed pasties.
The Growing eSports Marketplace for Brands
This week on Mindshare’s Culture Vulture Live, Alexis Fragile explores the rise of eSports in North America.
Q&A: Dentsu Aegis SE Asia on Automation, Programmatic and TV
The Summer of Sears continues! Jay Sears, Senior Vice President Marketplace Development of Rubicon Project discusses "Automation, Programmatic and TV" with Anna Chan of Dentsu Aegis' Amnet Asia. The two executives appeared at Rubicon Project's 2nd Annual Real Time Trading Update from SE Asia's Buy Side in Bintan, Indonesia in July 2015.
“AGT” Presents One of the Most Amazing Things You Will Ever See on Any Screen
NBC’s summer hit “America’s Got Talent” has offered up countless impressive acts during its decade-long run … but there was one on the show Tuesday night that in my opinion topped them all. In fact, it was so amazing that it doesn’t seem adequate to qualify it against other “AGT” acts only, so let me say this: It was one of the most incredible things I have ever seen on television – and, in part, on Instagram – period. My neighbors and I were as slack-jawed as judges Howard Stern, Heidi Klum, Mel B and Howie Mandel, and host Nick Cannon, at the end of the segment.
SMI: Vibrant July Gets Ad Spend Market Back on Track
Following a challenging start to the year for most media owners, July delivered the biggest growth numbers of 2015 so far, fueled by digital and a resurgent out-of-home market.
“Fear the Walking Dead,” “I Am Cait,” “Mr. Robot”
Shortly after the publication of my column last Friday, which was filled with hindsight reflections on the recently concluded Summer 2015 Television Critics Association tour, I heard from a former TCA member with an interesting observation of his own.
Will There Be a New Media Distribution Consensus?
It’s been awhile since DISH CEO Charles Ergen began accumulating spectrum to augment his ability to provide robust programming to subscribers via mobile broadband. Last week, I noted that AT&T CEO Randall Stephenson was, more or less kind of, leapfrogging Charlie and putting the strategic idea together by absorbing DirecTV. And, on the cheaper side of the immediate future, major cable MSO/ISPs Comcast, Charter (presumably with the Time Warner Cable and Bright House acquisitions), Cablevision, Cox and others already provide Internet access via Wi-Fi hotspots everywhere (and all together) and are moving to use almost any set-top box (or dongle or device) via the cloud. (Charter’s Thomas Rutledge was a mover behind the remote DVR at Cablevision.) Also at the end of last week, Investor’s Business Daily reported that Oppenheimer analyst Tim Horan was predicting that Verizon, Sprint and T-Mobile would, one way or another, find a way to partner a la AT&T/DirecTV, too.
“TREotM”: The 2nd Decade of the 21st Century
Chapter 12, Part 1
What We Know About Frequency in TV and Digital Advertising: Pt. 2
By Gian Fulgoni, Bill Harvey and Andrew Lipsman
Ashley Madison and the Future of Men
The recent Ashley Madison hack revealed that 86% of the site's users were men, casting men and the online dating culture into the spotlight--and not in a good way.