|HOME||MEDIAVILLAGE.com||WOMEN ADVANCING||HOOKED UP||MEMBERSHIP INFO||MEMBER COMPANIES||MEDIA BUSINESS REPORT||ECONOMIC FORECASTS||RESEARCH|
Published: October 25, 2007 at 01:29 AM GMT
Last Updated: October 25, 2007 at 01:29 AM GMT
Ever since word began to spread about the February 2009 switch from analog to digital television transmission there has been much talk about the expense of buying new flat-screen high-definition TVs. When news of the big change first broke I heard a chorus of complaints about the financial burden of buying new televisions when old sets were still in perfect working order. There was some grumbling as well from people who own expensive furniture in which they house their TVs. The shorter, wider flat-screen models don't fit the narrow old cabinets unless the new screens are smaller than the old screens, they complained, and what would be the point of that?
As time has passed, however, there seems to be less complaining about the cost of new equipment. This likely has a lot to do with people actually wanting high-def televisions after being dazzled by them in a store or someone else's home. People don't mind buying a new product if it's something they really want and they feel it's their choice, rather than something they are being made to buy whether they want to or not.
I suspect there will be another wave of outrage in late 2008 and early 2009 when the millions of people who haven't yet thought about the changes to come in the television landscape suddenly realize that their television viewing experience is going to cost them a lot more money above and beyond the purchase of new equipment. I am certain that most young Americans are too busy with the day-to-day business of working and raising children to give all that much thought to the coming changes in television. Similarly, I'm sure that millions of senior citizens would prefer not to think about coping with a huge shift in personal technology, not to mention the financial burden of buying new equipment or paying higher cable bills on their fixed incomes.
Check the above paragraph and you'll see three words rarely mentioned in all the excited reporting about new TV technology on morning news shows and everywhere else: "higher cable bills." Again, this is something few people are thinking about right now, but come February 17, 2009 when the shift hits the fan, attention will have to be paid.
I was at a dinner party this past Sunday in Westport, Connecticut, at the home of a family I would describe as being in the upper half of the middle class. Mom and dad are educated people with successful careers, and their teenage son is in middle school, and their very busy lives leave little time for watching television, let alone thinking about it. They are Standard Analog Cable Service subscribers. They currently and happily subscribe to the Family Cable basic cable package from Cablevision for a monthly fee of $46.95 plus $5.49 in taxes. They have four cable connections in their home (living room, family room, two bedrooms). They have a VCR or DVD-VCR combo unit attached to each of their four televisions. They do not receive any digital cable networks or pay cable networks, nor do they wish to. They do not have any DVRs because, they say, their VCRs work just fine and they don't use them all that much. They haven't even begun to discuss investing in one or more high-def TVs.
After reading Shelly Palmer's terrific column last Friday here on JackMyers.com I was full of useful information about the upcoming TV switch, which my friends were only mildly interested in hearing about -- until they began to do the math. According to what I read in Shelly's column, as of February 17, 2009 if they wish to continue to receive anything more than local broadcast networks on the four TVs in their home they will have to subscribe to Cablevision's iO digital package. At current pricing that will increase their monthly cable bill by $10 (for the digital service itself) plus an additional $6.25 "rental" for each of the four boxes (plus remotes) needed to enable their TVs to receive the digital signal. That's a boost of $35 per month (before taxes), or $420 per year (before taxes), to continue watching basic cable television on their four TVs in the manner to which they are currently accustomed, albeit with more networks. (The digital service won't give them HBO, or Showtime, or The Movie Channel, or Cinemax, or the Starz and Encore networks, or any On Demand features unless they pay even more money every month. But it does include the terrific VOOM HD networks with their wide-range of series, specials and movies.)
At present my friends pay $629.28 per year for cable, including taxes. That figure's days are numbered.
"We're going to have to pay more than $1000 a year just to watch television?" my hostess gasped. "That's ridiculous!" (Note: I am quoting Cablevision pricing in this column only because Cablevision is our local cable provider. As you read this, substitute the comparable pricing from your own provider for maximum impact.)
I explained that they might consider not getting boxes for the bedroom TVs because, as detailed in Shelly's column, they will still receive local broadcast channels even without boxes after the February 2009 switch (until February 2012, when they will go away, too).
They didn't like that idea. As it happens, most of their viewing preferences are on basic cable. They watch a lot of USA Network, ESPN, History Channel and HGTV, and their son loves Spike.
Since I had already dimmed the dinner party merriment, I preceded to further depress my hosts. If they choose to shell out the $6.25 (plus taxes) per digital cable box/remote, I explained, their VCRs would not be as useful as they are now. (With a digital hookup you cannot watch one network while recording another network on a VCR, nor can you program it to record shows on multiple networks in one evening, because the channel represented by the number on the set-top box is the only one the VCR can access, and digital cable boxes don't change channels by themselves, at least not in ways that accommodate VCRs.)
If they want to maintain the ability to freely record and watch programming on their four TV sets, I told them, they will have to rent four set-top digital cable boxes that include Cablevision's DVR service. The cost: An additional $10 per box (before taxes), which would add yet another $40 (before taxes) to their monthly cable bill, for a grand total (at current pricing) of $121.95 per month (before taxes).
"You can always watch television on your computers instead," I laughed. (They pay Cablevision an additional $44.95 per month for Internet access.) They weren't interested. I asked if they had read David Pogue's story in the October 18 edition of The New York Times in which he rated the networks' efforts at presenting their programming on their Web sites. They hadn't.
I thought of Pogue's insightful comment at the end of the piece: "Almost nobody wants to watch TV on a computer screen." (Try saying that out loud at a media gathering. You'll be the least popular person in the room.) People might want to watch recorded programming on a bus or a train or a plane, on their iPods or their laptops, but why in the world would anyone choose to do so at home where they have access to glorious big screen TVs? Kids, maybe. But grown ups?
At this point I thought of my next-door neighbors, a couple without children that made the switch to Cablevision's digital package a year or so ago, complete with a DVR. They only have one TV (a giant plasma screen), so they only needed one box. (When they switched, their monthly bill increased by $26.25 per month before taxes. That's $10 for the digital service, $6.25 for the set-top box and $10 for the DVR service.) They have enjoyed their deluxe new television-viewing experience, though they are the first to point out that they would not pay any more money to enjoy it on additional TVs. Also, their digital set-top box has twice malfunctioned in the last year, each time necessitating a time-consuming trip to the nearest Cablevision store (several towns away) for a replacement. (I'm not saying every set-top box from Cablevision will break down one or more times per year. But imagine the total time loss if multiple boxes were to require such special care.)
Getting back to that Westport dinner party: My hostess was distressed by all of my television talk. It's not like she can't afford to spend all that money every month on television. She simply doesn't want to and she resents feeling made to do so. For a moment I thought she was going to drop (like Marie Osmond would the following night on Dancing with the Stars). Instead she did what so many people do when they begin to think about all of this: She stopped thinking about it and tabled the subject until February 2009.
Navigating the eSports Sponsorship Market
The eSports phenomenon has taken flight -- and its sponsorship marketplace is beginning to take shape.
Nature vs. Nurture: Sales Traits You Can Learn – Part 3
In the previous installments of this series, we discussed how the sales traits of being persistent and goal oriented can be taught. Well, now let’s get into how any seller can become organized.
DM Training -- October 2015 Tips of the Week
Organize your connections.
Podcast: Jack Myers on "Between Worlds" with Mike Walsh
It’s not simply change that the media and advertising industry is going through, but a metamorphosis that could profoundly alter the industry’s landscape in the coming years, according to media ecologist Jack Myers. In the podcast below, Myers sits down with futurist and author Mike Walsh to discuss the future of media, the rise of emotion tech, and his upcoming book, The Future of Men: Masculinity in the Twenty-First Century.
Virtual Reality is Coming Directly to Your Living Room
This week, on Mindshare’s Culture Vulture Live: Tiffany Winter discusses some big moves for content players in the world of virtual reality.
Adblockalypse and More: Top 10 Takeaways from Advertising Week 2015
Another year, another Advertising Week, that seminal time when the industry descends upon Times Square to mingle, make connections and learn a little. Being relatively new to it, we had a lot to learn. For example, bring an external charger since outlets are few and far between. Also, do not purchase an iced coffee before going into the Times Center’s beverage-free main stage (or at least be stealthy about it). Below we share our Top 10 observations from Advertising Week 2015.
A Smart Way to Out-Block Ad Blocking
Enough was enough for the Interactive Advertising Bureau last week over the matter of ad blocking among Internet sites. They actually disrupted their own contribution to Advertising Week, attended by more than 1,300 people, to bring this matter to, in IAB's instance, a long-overdue head.
Access Confidential’s New Business Know-How
Whether you’re pitching new business or retaining current business, Lisa Colantuono’s tips below offer an easy-to-follow guide applicable for both agencies and media companies alike.
An Inside Tip for Higher Organic Reach on Facebook
If a company posts on Facebook without paid media, does anyone ever see it? More and more, we are finding that less and less people do. While this fact remains true, our analysts have discovered an upside to increasing organic reach. Unfortunately, you still need to buy Facebook media but it appears that Facebook is following Larry Page’s mantra of “Always deliver more than expected.”
Connecting with Mom: How YouTube Helps in Moments of Need
“YouTube reaches not only more 18-34 and but also 25-44 year-old females than any cable network in the U.S. on both desktop and mobile” according to an analysis Google had commissioned from Nielsen in February 2015. This finding added to our ongoing hunch that YouTube has become a destination for females out beyond just Millennials. As such, we had thought, “YouTube is becoming a core part of many moms’ daily routines and is positively impacting their lives.” So we decided to dig a little deeper and set out on a year-long research program to understand the role YouTube plays in the ever-evolving life of the modern mom. In this post, I will try to give you the topline.
Not Your Father’s Tune-In -- Part 4
This continues our multi-part series about the new tune-in advertising, whose rating effects are now generally being measured to varying degrees by all players, using Nielsen itself in some cases, and especially using set top box data where the statistical significance of the findings leads to greater confidence in acting on the results.
2015 –The Last Big Year for Fossil Fuel Use!
2015 will turn out to be the peak year of fossil fuel use. By 2020 it will be clear that the decline in consumption of fossil fuels began this year. It therefore will be the first year of flat to down fossil fuel emissions. This is a very significant event: The beginning of the end of the fossil fuel energy era.
You Can Skip This Ad in 5, 4, 3 …
How pathetic that we create a product we know to be so loathsome that if people could avoid it, they would. But, if we can just hold them hostage for the minimum amount of time for which a client can be convinced to pay, we consider our jobs done, and sadly, done well. And, while we spend our days convincing clients to spend money on a product no one much wants, we spend our nights avoiding that very same product.
Katy Loria of Screenvision on Changing Careers, Working Moms and More
Katy Loria, Executive Vice President, Chief Revenue Officer at Screenvision, made a huge career transition from television and digital at Viacom in Chicago to cinema advertising at Screenvision in New York. She says that “after so many years at Viacom, which was a wonderful place to work, I wanted a change of pace. I went from big company to small company, from public company to private company and from consumer facing brand to non-consumer facing. For me it was a new and different challenge.”
The Beverly Billionaires, Or How to Make Podcasts Profitable
Take a good look at the photo above. Through the 1970's those four faces drove about a billion dollars to CBS and producer Mark Goodson. They were the original stars of “The Match Game.” From 1973-1982 they dominated daytime TV ratings and profits. Same scenery year to year. Incredibly small prizes. Absolutely no challenging Q&As.