|HOME||MEDIABIZBLOGGERS.com||WOMEN in MEDIA||HOOKED UP||MEMBERSHIP INFO||MEMBER COMPANIES||MEDIA BUSINESS REPORT||ECONOMIC FORECASTS||RESEARCH|
Published: December 6, 2012 at 05:46 AM GMT
Last Updated: December 5, 2012 at 05:46 AM GMT
For a number of years now, we have had strong evidence that word of mouth is highly valued by consumers and that it is ubiquitous. McKinsey has gone so far as to call word of mouth "the most disruptive force in marketing." CMO surveys by firms like IBM suggest that the overwhelming majority plan to increase their investment in social media, but ROI metrics have been hard to come by and CMOs say increasingly those will be the metrics by which they will measure success of their marketing efforts. According to IBM, "even among the most successful enterprises, half of all CMOs feel insufficiently prepared to provide hard numbers [for return on marketing investment]."
A new white paper by marketing analytics expert MarketShare and the Keller Fay Group, called "Quantifying the Role of Social Voice in Marketing Effectiveness" , provides new and compelling evidence that word of mouth (offline and online) drives sales to a considerable degree – providing both a direct and an indirect impact on sales, amplifying the impact of marketing as people talk about the marketing or share it via social media. And, it demonstrates that the impact can be measured. (For a free copy of the Executive Summary, contact me.)
The analysis looks at brands in four categories – beverages, auto, investments and brokerage – and seeks to determine how much impact "Social Voice" (defined as both online and offline word of mouth) has on marketing and on sales when compared with a range of other variables that might drive marketing effectiveness. (See below for more detail on what else was measured in this study.)
Among the key findings from the modeling are:
How the model was built: Once the four product categories were selected (see above), MarketShare incorporated Social Voice data into several multi-year modeling data sets that incorporated a large number of potential drivers of sales, including:
· Non-media marketing spend (e.g., event sponsorships, PR, etc.)
· Offline WOM mentions (from Keller Fay's TalkTrack® solution)
MarketShare analyzed the data and developed multivariate and multi-equation econometric models to estimate short-and long-term advertising effectiveness through a series of interrelated equations.
The importance of this analysis is that it helps to move word of mouth from a nice to have activity – who wouldn't want people to say nice things about their brands? – to one that is understood to be a central driver of marketing effectiveness and sales. It acts as an amplifier of all types of marketing. Only when the role of offline and online word of mouth is understood and treated as a vital strategic asset can brands in today's consumer marketplace expect to achieve industry-leading return on investment from their marketing investment. Further, the analysis supports the notion – frequently proffered by Keller Fay, including in our recent book The Face-to-Face Book – that when it comes to social influence, offline WOM can play a bigger and more impactful role than online social media. The central importance of offline, face-to-face conversations and the forces that drive them must be understood and planned for by every marketer interested in maximizing their return on marketing investment.
Ed Keller, CEO of the Keller Fay Group, has been called "one of the most recognized names in word of mouth." His new book, The Face-to-Face Book: Why Real Relationships Rule in a Digital Marketplace, was recently published by Free Press/Simon & Schuster. You can follow Ed Keller on Twitter, Facebook and Google+, or contact him directly at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Read all Ed’s MediaBizBloggers commentaries at WOM Matters.
Check us out on Facebook at MediaBizBloggers.com
Follow our Twitter updates @MediaBizBlogger
The opinions and points of view expressed in this commentary are exclusively the views of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of MediaBizBloggers.com management or associated bloggers. MediaBizBloggers is an open thought leadership platform and readers may share their comments and opinions in response to all commentaries.
Is ANYONE watching “Reign”? You REALLY need to be watching it. I watched the censored version last night and sat through Tresemme, Verizon, Keds, Clorex, Kohls, Degree and a bunch of other commercials just so I could see the King and Kenna's and Mary and Francis' uncensored sex scenes. Brilliant move on The CW's part but let me save you the trouble ... I couldn't see any difference. Maybe a tiny bit of extra skin on Kenna and a few extra thrusts between Francis and Mary; it totally wasn't worth it, but it is still a great strategy. I don't know what I was thinking they'd show. Kids are still going to go online to see it. I had forgotten that back in the day, everyone had to watch the consummation of a royal marriage. That had to be super awkward, but Francis didn't let all those eyes stop him, he was apparently able to "perform." The king made Bash watch which had to just kill him. Of course Mary felt his eyes blazing on her while his bro was giving it to her big time. Mary chose Francis once she knew that the prophecy had changed and he would live, but who knows what the story is. Nostradamus saw Clarissa dead and now she's not. So Bash is devastated and in danger, Clarissa's on the loose, the Queen's not going to be beheaded and I'm betting that now that Francis and Mary are married, Lola's going to be pregnant with Francis's baby. See...you need to watch this show!Read More
Agencies have for very many years undersold their (usually excellent) planning, research and analytics capabilities, whilst at the same time focusing their commercial efforts on the increasingly complicated buying end of what they do. Ask yourself this: If faced with two options, the first of which involves some hard thinking (and hard negotiating with CMO’s and CFO’s) in order to demonstrate the true business value of communications planning and research; and the second involves toughing it out with the media suppliers (with no client anywhere in sight) in order to secure first a cheaper cost-per-thousand (however irrelevant such a measure might be) and second a rebate for the agency based on the agency’s total volume, which would you choose?Read More