|HOME||MEDIABIZBLOGGERS.com||WOMEN in MEDIA||HOOKED UP||MEMBERSHIP INFO||MEMBER COMPANIES||MEDIA BUSINESS REPORT||ECONOMIC FORECASTS||RESEARCH|
Published: June 15, 2012 at 04:48 PM GMT
Last Updated: June 15, 2012 at 04:48 PM GMT
Apple and Google are using military-grade spy planes to map your backyard. That's the sensationalist headline. I like it. It's really scary and it's perfect for Fud-mongering. (FUD is an abbreviation for fear, uncertainty and doubt.) Similar headlines have everyone from privacy advocates to private citizens up in arms. After all, the 17th century proverb, "good fences make good neighbors" has no meaning in the age of spy planes. According to some reports, the resolution of the spy cameras is so good, that you can see objects as small as 4 inches. Other reports foretell of the capability to see through skylights and open windows – all kidding aside, it's pretty creepy.
But whether this particular use case creeps you out or not, the creep factor is not the issue. The issue is framed by the question, "Is there any reasonable expectation of privacy in the 21st century?"
I submit that this is the perfect time to start a dialog about what privacy is, what it is not and what rights we should reasonably expect.
To start this dialog, we need to understand the full nature of the technological capability we are up against. Apple and Google using military-grade tools to create better way-finding tools for their maps and other applications is actually pretty benign. Want to think about surveillance? Great, let's think about it the right way.
Within a couple of years, file storage will be inexpensive enough and computers will be small and powerful enough to create work environments that are under Star Trek-like audio/video surveillance 24/7. This might mean, for example, that every conversation you have at your job – no matter where it is and no matter who it is with – will be recorded and analyzed. The computer programs will be trained to understand what you are saying, syntax, context and to flag anything that is deemed inappropriate or un-business-like. Forget the totally lame; "This call is being recorded for quality assurance," they're going to record everything.
Does this sound Orwellian or paranoid? It may. But unless you assume that the technology is already in-place, you can't start thinking about writing rules and laws or even setting guidelines. I promise you, the capability to spy on your every word, movement, email and electronic transaction is already in place – the only thing that is missing is a cost-effective way to deal with the explosive amounts of data that this type of surveillance generates – and that capability is easily within sight.
Right now companies asking you to store your music and movies in the cloud are bombarding you. That's a good use of cloud technology, but you know what it's really great for? It's great for big audio/video surveillance files. In fact, it's the best place for them because cloud storage is easily accessed by cloud computers – and cloud computers have the capacity to crunch extremely large files.
So, now that you are thinking about an invasion of your privacy so deep that it is actually disturbing, what should we do? How should we start to sort out the issue? What are the questions you want to ask? What are the guidelines you will insist upon?
If, under some circumstances, you might be willing to be observed in this way, who should have access to the data? Should anyone be allowed to correlate it to other data, such as medical or financial records?
I've often wondered how much money could be saved (and earned) by simply using EZ-pass data to issue speeding tickets. If the speed limit is 55 mph and you go through two toll booths in less time than it should take you at 55 mph, you are unequivocally guilty of speeding. Why don't they just put a few high-speed EZ-pass lanes on the highway, fire the cops, and send tickets in the mail? It would be easier, cheaper and a much better profit center.
OK, now, expand this to everything you do? No matter how good your imagination is, no matter how much science fiction you've read, you're going to come up short on the ways this kind of surveillance data can be obtained and used.
So let's take some action. Contact your elected officials and tell them how you feel about privacy. Your privacy. My privacy. Everyone's privacy. What are we as a society willing to give up for the quality of our digital enjoyment? It's "the" question of our time.
Shelly Palmer is Fox 5 New York's On-air Tech Expert (WNYW-TV) and the host of Fox Television's monthly show Shelly Palmer Digital Living. He also hosts United Stations Radio Network's, Shelly Palmer Digital Living Daily, a daily syndicated radio report that features insightful commentary and a unique insiders take on the biggest stories in technology, media, and entertainment. He is Managing Director of Advanced Media Ventures Group, LLC an industry-leading advisory and business development firm and a member of the Executive Committee of the National Academy of Television Arts & Sciences (the organization that bestows the coveted Emmy® Awards). Palmer is the author of Television Disrupted: The Transition from Network to Networked TV 2nd Edition (York House Press, 2008) the seminal book about the technological, economic, and sociological forces that are changing everything and, Overcoming The Digital Divide: How to use Social Media and Digital Tools to Reinvent Yourself and Your Career (York House Press, 2011) For more information, visit shellypalmer.com.
Read all Shelly's MediaBizBloggers commentaries at Shelly Palmer Report.
Check us out on Facebook at MediaBizBloggers.com
Follow our Twitter updates @MediaBizBlogger
The opinions and points of view expressed in this commentary are exclusively the views of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of MediaBizBloggers.com management or associated bloggers. MediaBizBloggers is an open thought leadership platform and readers may share their comments and opinions in response to all commentaries.
I no longer read business books. Been there, done that for too many years. Stimulation comes from reading many other sources. My current obsession seems to be evolutionary theory. And there are few better to read than Stephen Jay Gould. I prefer him to evolutionary reductionists just as I push away from all sorts of reductionism in every field imaginable. There is a psychological matrix that all reductionists share. I just don’t fit that mold I guess. Online marketing is presently overwhelmed with marketing reductionism.Read More
Video is a big deal and will only continue to grow. Cisco projects Internet video traffic will be 69% of all global consumer Internet traffic in 2017. But video isn’t a big deal solely because of scale. According to comScore, 64% of viewers are more likely to make a purchase in an online store after viewing a video. Even if viewers don’t purchase after seeing a video, sharing video is a big deal. Data from Invodo shows 92% of mobile video viewers share videos with others.Read More