Free ContentFor Subscribers Only
HOME WALL STREET REPORT THINKTANK CLASSIC JACK SUBSCRIPTION INFO PORTFOLIO COMPANIES MEDIA BUSINESS REPORT ECONOMIC FORECASTS RESEARCH
Home > JackMyersThinkTank > Radio Stations and Advertisers Consider Withdrawing Support for Rush Limbaugh

Radio Stations and Advertisers Consider Withdrawing Support for Rush Limbaugh

March 3, 2009
Rush Limbaugh

Published: March 3, 2009 at 11:10 AM GMT
Last Updated: March 4, 2009 at 11:10 AM GMT

Rush Limbaugh's rhetoric has crossed the line between free speech and a political campaign. It's appropriate and necessary for media to give voice to political opposition, but it is inappropriate when on-air media talent becomes the voice for a political opposition party. Limbaugh's lengthy Castro-like speech to the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) was his coming out party for a run for president of the United States and as he emerges as the new leader and voice of the Republican Party, radio stations and advertisers have an obligation to reconsider their support.

It is essential to question whether Limbaugh should continue to have access to the public airwaves and whether advertisers should continue to support him. The support of advertisers could be easily perceived as a statement of political support for Limbaugh's policies. Advertisers and radio stations that support Limbaugh could - and perhaps should -- be interpreted as providing explicit support for the far right wing of Conservative politics. Giving a political party control over the press is a dangerous precedent, and a Sustainable Free Press requires that the people believe that media takes responsibility for the content it delivers. An editorial voice is far different than a politician's control over the press, which throughout history has been the first step toward dictatorship.

Limbaugh's only real job is to appeal to a very small but loyal audience and deliver them each day to his radio program. His only professional need is to generate larger audiences than other radio show hosts and in that context he is no different than a snake charmer or tattoo lady on the carnival midway. But we should not ignore Rush Limbaugh's oratory. He has taken over the political leadership of the far right wing activist group in our country - a group who appear to believe the last eight years were the best in our nation's history and a group who may count among them advocates for violent anti-government actions. Limbaugh, in his (CPAC) speech, explained why he believes it's acceptable to hope for the President of the United States to fail. He essentially has called for the overthrow of the current government, saying "it is time to take back our nation." Politicians are subject to being voted in or out of office. Those who find Limbaugh's political calls as the leader of the "take back the nation" campaign to be inappropriate for a radio host have a more immediate option: to withdraw support.

This is a dangerous time for the American radio industry. Advertising revenues are drying up. While leading Republican industrialists are among those who support Limbaugh's calls for action by the wealthy few against the government, many of these same leaders are dependent upon the Obama Recovery Plan to bail them out of the mess they have put themselves and the nation in. Media companies are dependent upon a national economic recovery. Media owners must think long and hard about their role in society and the messages they want to communicate about their support for Limbaugh and what many consider to be his politics of hate. Limbaugh is using his bully pulpit to launch a presidential campaign that radio stations and advertisers are explicitly enabling. If the proposed boycotts against Limbaugh's advertisers and stations gain any momentum, it will be just one more challenge for an already challenged industry.

The media industry and marketers should consider getting out ahead of the Limbaugh backlash. Radio station owners and advertisers should consider their own role in our nation today. They should not censor content. But they need to acknowledge Limbaugh's new role as a politician and set profits aside to protect the fundamental separation of a free and independent press from political control over content.

Boycotts are rarely successful and several other times over the past few years various media outlets and writers have called for a boycott of Limbaugh's advertisers. Previous advertisers have been listed at (http://www.dailykos.com/story/2007/4/24/121022/830) and organizations are now readying updated lists with such advertisers as GoToMyPC. These boycotts are also calling on those who oppose Limbaugh to reject those radio stations that carry his syndicated program. Boycotting Limbaugh's program itself is a useless exercise, but there has been a call to boycott other programming on the stations that carry his program, sending a strong message that stations cannot simply accept anti-government rhetoric without paying a price. Limbaugh publishes his station list at http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/menu/rush.guest.all.html.

add this social bookmark link

13 Comments
the truth seeker - March 3, 2009
Hey Jack did Rush refuse to buy an ad on your crappy site or turn down buying your research that it skewed to those who pay you? If you are ranting about transparency why don't you disclose how many companies pay you to write stories about them and promote them in inappropriate editorial ways. People in glass houses...
Ellis - March 3, 2009
Godwin's law be damned.

Rush Limbaugh = American Hitler.
Headache on Tuesday - March 3, 2009
I subscribe to Jack Myers to get news on the what the industry is doing, not what Jack Myers thinks the industry should do. While I understand that this is your forum, I think it is humourous that you are condemning Rush for touting his ideals and yet here you are doing the same. If anything this makes me stronger in my resolve to make sure that the people can hear what they want to hear on the radio and television and are not subjected to "Unfairness Doctrines" that make people listen to left-wing programming that can not get an audience on the radio without government intervention. All right wingers want President Obama to be the best president ever because that's what this nation needs right now - however, making the US government a charity organization for healthcare and redistributing people's money will not create a stronger US and that is where conservatives hope to see others fail.
Jim - March 3, 2009
What a bunch of claptrap. You have apparently unilaterally decided that Limbaugh is preparing to run for office, which makes him a politician, which then renders him unfree to express his conservative opinions on the radio. A faulty conclusion based on an assumption not in evidence. With your own little "fairness doctrine," you are counseling stations and advertisers to withdraw their support.



You are apparently oblivious to evidence that the major organs of the mainstream press, including major newspapers, NBC, CBS, ABC, CNN, MSNBC have been in the pocket of the Democratic Party for years, and especially in its love affair with Saint Obama. If ever a political party had tacit control over the press, it's the Democratic party.



Yours is just another voice trying to silence the one limited corner of talk radio that offers a conservative viewpoint to counter the rampant march toward socialism that we are currently witnessing. I agree with you that this is a dangerous time for the radio industry, but it is also a dangerous time for our country as our individual liberties are being eroded day by day.

LiechtenFilms - March 3, 2009
Rush is so dreadful and unprofessional, he wrecks the image of conservatives. He has destroyed so many careers of innocent people in his wake, as he blows out his nasty hot air. I used to be a professional pilot, and as a woman had little resistance until this fat old white guy came along, blasting women pilots for getting on due to affirmative action. My work life went south after that, with a lot of right wing badgering. A plane demands upmost skill in handling, and so there's no room for short cut career paths. All pilots at the professional level are excellent. That's why I took up flying, because of it's demand for excellence. I come from a family dedicated to excellence. That used to be what conservative was all about. Not any more. Sad.
Finrod - March 3, 2009
You, sir, are a prime example of why the First Amendment was written. Rush Limbaugh has as much right to free speech as you do; the difference between him and you is that he doesn't try to get his critics thrown off the air.

If you really think that Rush Limbaugh is going to run for President, then I have two questions: 1) What are you smoking? 2) Where can I buy some, because whatever you're smoking is powerful enough to blast your mind into a pre-schooler's playground, which might be a fun way to escape the horrors of the current Administration for a little while at least.
Alan Gerson - March 3, 2009
Well done Jack. There should be consequences for such demagogery. It is astonishing that with all the problems facing our nation to call for obstructionism and hope that Government fails to solve our mutual problems for temporary partisan political advantage does not raise more National outrage. I find such rhetoric at this time in our history destructive to the functioning of democracy and frankly repugnant.

Alan
$comment.name - March 4, 2009
Limbaugh is the embodiment of all the worst qualities an American could have. He is racist, chauvinist, homophobic, and filled with hate. I want that list of advertisers so I can join the campaign to boycott them. I won't support ANYONE who supports Rush. He wants to see this country fail and doesn't give a s**t how many people are hurt in the process, much less what it does to our nation's future. The ONLY thing he cares about is HIMSELF. He is disgusting!!!!
OncleWillie - March 4, 2009
I am amused by the statement "very small but loyal" for one of the largest audiences on radio in the country. He is obviously doing something right if he has scared you so badly. Your arguments are logically faulty and disingenuous. Grow up, be a man and just say you hate his politics. You will be a better person for it.

I am worried about your statement "stations cannot simply accept anti-government rhetoric". You do know that the 1st Amendment gives special license in its protection of POLTICAL speech? Or then again, based on your article, maybe you didn't know that. However that may be, it is frightening to think you actively seek to deprive Mr. Limbaugh his place on the radio airwaves but that you would call for elimination of any voice that disagreed with the government.
Mike - March 5, 2009
Anyone who would defend this drug-addled windbag only goes to prove my brother Jeff's sage observation that we become our attention.

Remember how the world laughed at us when we elected GW--twice. Imagine what they must think of this idiot and the people who follow him?

Ditto-heads: Get a life.

OncleWillie - March 5, 2009
"...sending a strong message that stations cannot simply accept anti-government rhetoric without paying a price." Listen to yourself! You oppose the right of the people to exercise free speech, and even the speech accorded the most deference: political speech. I find that terrifying.

You might also consider Mr. Limbaugh is not anti-government but anti-President Obama. There is a difference. If wanting to muzzle dissident viewpoints is what you call progressive politics then I want no part of it.
Jim - March 6, 2009
This is shameful what you're doing. You may not like Rush Limbaugh, but pressuring stations and advertisers to drop him just because you don't like what he's saying is unconscionable. Another example of left wing hypocrisy on the matter of free speech. Limbaugh is a commentator, not a politician, and he should be free to speak his mind in any forum he chooses. Shame.
Mediaman - March 7, 2009
I'm impressed... impressed that Mr. Myers could be so self-deluded as to think rational people would ever be persuaded by what must be the most unimaginative piece of non-sensical, misleading clap-trap ever to hit the net... and to think this man charges $12,000 a year for a corporate 'consulting' newletter. What a fantastic scam...
Post a Comment










Archive

January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011

See all Archived Material

Jack Myers ThinkTank

Featured MediaBizBloggers

Much of our time at the DPAA over the past year has been invested in meeting with agencies and brands to understand their needs, and also their perception and mindset about digital place-based media. Early on in this process, it became clear that the digital place-based media industry needs to more clearly define itself to these important constituencies. Our industry's tremendous revenue gains over the past couple of years notwithstanding, there is no question that our long-term growth hinges on clarifying what we are… and are not.

Read More
2012 Network TV Upfront Event Calendar
By: MediaBizBloggers.com

2012 Network TV Upfront Calendar

Read More
Click Here for Subscription Information
Contact Us  |  Site Map  |  Terms of Use  |  Privacy Policy  |  RSS Feeds