jackmyers.com  
commentary

Gene DeWitt: Beijing Olympics: In Defense of China, Part Two - MediaBizBloggers.com

China, Olympics, Bejing
Republic of China Emblem

Published: April 30, 2008 at 08:12 AM GMT
Last Updated: July 18, 2008 at 08:12 AM GMT

By Gene DeWitt I began my last post with a story about my visit to Moscow and Beijing in early 1980. During this trip I was informed that the United States had decided to boycott the 1980 Summer Games in Moscow because of the Soviet Union's invasion of Afghanistan, My how things change over time; I read recently that the current Russian government is assisting the U.S. in transporting military supplies to support our invasion of Afghanistan.

I'd like to begin this post with a couple of quotes from Wikipedia's entry for the People's Republic of China:

"Since 1978,China's market-based economic reforms have helped lift over 400 million Chinese out of poverty, bringing down the poverty rate from 53% of population in 1981 to 8% by 2001.

 

 

China argues "that the notion of human rights should take into account a country's present level of economic development, and focus more on the people's rights to subsistence and development in poorer countries."

It seems to me that the underlying problem in the West's view of China is that we neither understand nor respect the tremendous strides that this country and its citizens have made over the past thirty years in enhancing the lives of its people.

Who are we to say that if China had offered more 'freedom' to its peoples that it would not have experienced

  • The civil wars of the former Yugoslavia;
  • The genocide of Rwanda; and/or
  • The takeover of Iran by fanatical fundamentalists

A stable prosperous China has brought the West a long period of economic prosperity fueled largely by hard working Chinese wage-earners and entrepreneurs.

In a country as large and diverse as China, stability is valued more highly than the right to protest. People who have seen their children grow in health, wealth and education realize that such progress requires a strong governmental infrastructure. The proof of this is in the fact that if open elections were held today the current government in China would undoubtedly win an overwhelming majority of the vote.

The Chinese people have great pride in their long heritage and their current successes. The 2008 Olympics were meant to celebrate Chinese history and modern achievements. There is no question in my mind that these Olympics would also have heralded greater comfort for the Chinese in the international community where they have not always felt welcome.

I think that the American multinational companies who are holding firm on their sponsorship of the 2008 Summer Olympics in Beijing are wise, whatever their motivations. AT&T, Coca-Cola,Visa International, McDonald’s, Johnson & Johnson, anheuser-Busch, Bank of America, Home Depot and United Parcel certainly recognize the importance of China to their businesses. Similarly, I think it's inevitable that China will ultimately recognize the alignment of its own interests with global public opinion.

To communicate with or to be contacted by the executives and/or companies mentioned in this column, link to JackMyers Connection Hotline.

archive

add this social bookmark link


Post a Comment
  1. Name or nickname:
  2. Email:
  3. Comment:
Reader Comments(1)
Everything is relevant. While there may have been a reduction in poverty levels (based on whose statistics?), the flip side of the coin sees a wider gap between the have-nots and the have-everythings. Discontent is at an all time high with an undercurrent that will soon test the will of the Chinese governemt like never before. A clash is inevitable.
China is not yet a suitable platform to promote Olympic values and ideals, leading by example and a respect for fundamental universal ethical principles.
This is not the case today. The mere fact that journalists and tourists will have every keystroke on their laptops monitored, every site visited recorded, every email subjected to review oversteps the boundaries of a free society on every level.
Over the last few months we have seen nothing less than an escalation of acts by its government, shoving human rights to the sidelines, in an effort to "look good" to the global community.
As for the advertisers, most will likely never admit their early decision was a mistake.
Posted at 04:35 AM on Aug 1, 2008 by Paul B.
media industry poll
Which New Fall Series Are You Most Looking Forward To?