|HOME||MEDIABIZBLOGGERS.com||WOMEN in MEDIA||HOOKED UP||MEMBERSHIP INFO||MEMBER COMPANIES||MEDIA BUSINESS REPORT||ECONOMIC FORECASTS||RESEARCH|
Published: December 3, 2008 at 04:02 PM GMT
Last Updated: December 8, 2008 at 04:02 PM GMT
The following commentary was the introduction to my 1993 book Adbashing: Surviving the Attacks on Advertising. In it I ask questions that take on even more critical importance today than 15-years ago when they were originally written.
On the surface the advertising industry appears to be a business where change comes with the territory. But the state of constant change is deceiving. In reality, the marketing, advertising and media businesses are staid and relatively unchanging. Practices and influences from as far back as the late-1800s are still dictating decisions. In the new media and marketing environment of the 21st Century, many of these practices no longer will be relevant.
Worse, these practices are killing the advertising business. Adherence to the past and reliance on traditional means of conducting business have precipitated a collapse of the foundation, structures and principles upon which the advertising industry, and our nation's economic support system are based.
During the past 20 years America's marketing muscle, upon which it built its worldwide economic and political strength, has been sapped. Case studies charting the decline of U.S. fill the bookstores. It is time to take a hard look at our approaches to marketing.
This book is about change: why and how the marketing, advertising and media businesses must completely change the concepts, premises and strategies upon which they operate. Much of this book is focused on changes that have taken place in society and the hidden impact they are having on the foundation of financial and consumer support for the television programs we watch, the magazines and newspapers we read, the radio stations to which we listen, the products we buy, the stores and locations in which we shop.
I hope all readers will be enlightened and will think about how they are responding to the reality of a changing world. My goal in writing Adbashing is that all of us in advertising and media may change and thrive and never be forced to confront the prospect of working in a dying business.
Jack Myers has been writing, speaking and consulting on the impact of change on media, marketing and advertising for more than two decades. He can be contacted at firstname.lastname@example.org
Here's what was wonderful about Monday night's Primetime Emmy Awards, in no particular order: All the awards for “Breaking Bad”; everything Bryan Cranston did (from that smooch with Julia Louis-Dreyfus to an inspiring acceptance speech), “Fargo” being named Outstanding Miniseries, “The Normal Heart” being named Outstanding Movie; the beautiful In Memoriam sequence headlined by Sara Bareilles' rendition of “Smile” and Billy Crystal's thoughts of Robin Williams, and “Billy on the Street.” Here's what was far from wonderful about the same event: “Orange is the New Black” being passed over, “Fargo” and “The Normal Heart” being denied key acting and creative honors, Cicely Tyson losing out for “The Trip to Bountiful” and Weird Al Yankovic's interminable song melody.Read More
Why should humans own all the world’s copyrights? The question is prompted by a photograph that’s made worldwide news. In Indonesia, a female crested black macaque monkey picked up a camera owned by photographer David Slater. I won’t focus much on the story of the monkey and her selfie because that topic has already been well-discussed in the media. Yet the story sets the table for more intriguing and ultimately more important issues. A brief recap of the story of the monkey and the selfie follows. The monkey did what a lot of us would do with a camera. She took selfies.Read More